Measuring Merger & Acquisition (M&A) Cultural Risk and Compatibility (Target, Acquirer)
June 20, 2019 Leave a comment
In this blog article, you will quickly learn the following and M&A Culture Compatibility:
- What is the #1 success factor for M&A culture deals to succeed?
- What are the top reasons M&A deals fail in terms of delivering the expected ROI?
- The typical best practice M&A process and how this misses and/or plants a culture compatibility “ticking time bomb” that leads to the deal’s eventual failure.
- The underlying reasons M&A deal makers are actually trying to hide these hidden M&A cultural time bombs that will leave them making top $$$ while leaving you holding an empty bag of cash in which cultures collide and chaos ensues
- How pre-deal cultural compatibility & risks can now be measured!!
- Examples of pre-deal measurement of Cultural Risk in M&A Deals
- How to identify acquirer & target pre-deal cultural types
- How to identify pre-deal culture conflict points
- How to identify pre-deal cultural synergies (acquirer-target)
- How you can actually change your M&A process to include pre-deal measurement of cultural risk and compatibility prior to deal closure!

We all know in our gut or have heard that pre M&A culture is a top factor that either makes or breaks a M&A deal . Above is the proof that it actually is #1.

We also all have heard numerous stories as to how pre M&A Culture consistently has made mergers a disaster, resulting in minimal or negative M&A deal return! Above is proof that culture is a top reason for M&A failures (reasons #2, #3, #4 & #8).

Yet, when we examine supposed best practice M&A process life-cycles as above, we are hard pressed to find where culture is even a consideration and cultural compatibility examination most likely comes post-deal closure when it is too late. Examining whether the two cultures will work well together post-deal is like trying to stop an accelerating train from crashing into the station at 150 MPH with less than a mile to go.

Many that I speak to say that the main reason culture is ignored vs. the financials is that the deal makers want to profit from the transaction and are opposed to alerting the acquiring company of the latent risks.
It is therefore mostly assumed that cultural incompatibility can be ‘managed’ via heavy handed company directives post-deal. It lastly assumes that the ability to measure and quantify pre-deal cultural (in)compatibility is not possible. That last statement was most certainly true until culture analysis tools like CultureTalk were recently introduced to the marketplace.
There aren’t good or bad Archetypes, but each has a strength and shadow side that we need to understand in order to drive maximized organizational effectiveness and this is especially true when merging two different Archetypal cultures.
Here is an overview of each of the 12 Archetypes:

*Above Graphic courtesy of CultureTalk
Each of the 12 Archtypes above comes with a set of predominant strengths (shown above) and shadows that need to be understood and managed.

M&A Acquiring Company & Acquired Company Cultural & Gap Analysis
*Above Graphic courtesy of CultureTalk
By performing an organizational CultureTalk assessment, M&A Deal makers and stakeholders can quickly determine the risks, compatibilities and behavior gaps that need to be managed.

*Above Graphic components courtesy of CultureTalk and Brand Foundations
By performing an organizational deep dive assessment, M&A Deal makers and stakeholders can unearth all potential train wrecks that typically cause M&A deals to fail and then develop an action plan on how to manage these pending collision points to win-win scenarios (target company, acquirer).

*Above Graphic courtesy of CultureTalk and Brand Foundations
By performing a culture quadrant conflict analysis, M&A Deal makers and stakeholders can identify and isolate the specific points where merging cultures are very likely going to collide. They can then develop an organizational mitigation design and organizational development road-map to carefully and judiciously manage to these conflict points. Without this, I have witnessed the meltdown of M&A deals and, most importantly – the death knell of companies, the rapid defection of customers at a non-sustainable long-term rate (hence my CRM connection to M&A and Culture).

*Above Graphic components courtesy of CultureTalk and BrandFoundations
By performing a culture quadrant synergy analysis, M&A Deal makers and stakeholders can develop a plan for accelerating mutually compatible cultural connection (or compatibility) points. By identifying and capitalizing these cultural synergies, the two companies can adopt a hybrid culture consisting of the best of the best blended cultural practices.
That concludes my overview of measuring and managing cultural risk pre M&A deal and how it can optimize the value of the M&A transaction
If your organization is seeking experienced assistance in measuring the pre-deal M&A risk and then managing to this risk to optimize the merger investment, then give me a call or e-mail me at 518-339-5857 or stevenjeffes@gmail.com
Lastly, this is just one article of 60+ total I have written on Customer strategy, CRM, marketing, product management, competitive intelligence, corporate innovation, change management – all of which I have significant experience in delivering for Fortune 500 companies.
* CultureTalk is an organizational culture assessment and audit system that provides in-depth training and materials to deliver engagements with leaders and teams. (https://culturetalk.com/)
* Brand Foundations is a CultureTalk Certified Partner and utilizes the suite of assessments and tools to work with clients across diverse brand development and organizational culture projects. (http://www.brandfoundations.us/)
